QuickTime Alternative 3.2.2 reviews
3.72
from 257 Reviews
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
QTA 1.71 doesn't seem to let me view anything on the Apple trailers site, with IE. Just blank rectangles with little red X's in the corner.
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
how could this be called final when functionality is broken in firefox.
it freezes/crashes firefox 1.5.0.4 as reported earlier.
it freezes/crashes firefox 1.5.0.4 as reported earlier.
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
I just want to report that version 1.71 simply don't work with Opera 9. I was trying to play some trailers at Apple and Opera always freezes/crashes when the plugin is loading.
I've reinstalled version 1.70 and all is working again.
I've reinstalled version 1.70 and all is working again.
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
Nice software but...
Are we really forced to use media player? Is there a way to still use QT viewer for mp4 formats?
Thanks
Are we really forced to use media player? Is there a way to still use QT viewer for mp4 formats?
Thanks
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
Nice tool, but firefox doesn't like the new version 1.71 : fatal error because of quicktimeessential.qtx. Return to 1.70 and no problem with it.
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
I tried QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final, and decided to use Windows Media Player (not Classic). The MOV files are played, with VIDEO, and NO SOUND/ NO AUDIO.
- Is there a way to trouble shoot this?
- Is this a bug or a feature?
Are we forced to use Media Player Classic?
- Is there a way to trouble shoot this?
- Is this a bug or a feature?
Are we forced to use Media Player Classic?
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final
When I try to install QuickTime Alternative 1.71 final I get error about missing msvcr71.dll file. :/
OS Windows 2000
OS Windows 2000
QuickTime Alternative 1.71 beta 2
since 1.70 firefox crashes and some unexpected error when opening qt settings on win2003.
so for now i stick to 1.69
so for now i stick to 1.69
QuickTime Alternative 1.70
installed 1.7 qta. and its not wokring with firefox 1.0.5.4 at all. dosent pik up anything that has to deal with quicktime..
QuickTime Alternative 1.70
Unnecessary. 1.70 no longer supports anything older than WinXP, and if you can stomach XP, you don't need QT alternative. It's still a hack, it still doesn't support all QT, and the official QT player is no more annoying than XP in general. As long as you have a third-party player for all your QT formats, the official player will politely go away.
On the other hand, setting RealPlayer, QT, and WIMP to fight over file associations is still more amusing than most movies.
On the other hand, setting RealPlayer, QT, and WIMP to fight over file associations is still more amusing than most movies.
QuickTime Alternative 1.70
Great tool!
HD content plays great in media player classic.
However in WMP 9, I get HD video but no audio. If I play a standard file I get audio. Weird that one player would play it the other not.
Of course this also means MCE plays video only, no audio (again, only for HD content from Apple site).
Keep up the good work!
HD content plays great in media player classic.
However in WMP 9, I get HD video but no audio. If I play a standard file I get audio. Weird that one player would play it the other not.
Of course this also means MCE plays video only, no audio (again, only for HD content from Apple site).
Keep up the good work!
QuickTime Alternative 1.70
Why does it ALWAYS delete all previous Media Player Classic settings from the registry and revert to the stupid legacy (non-noadmin-compatible!) INI file when I install a new version?? This is really not understandable for me.
QuickTime Alternative 1.70
The Directshow Filter works well, EXCEPT that it seems to hold the wrong kind of file lock. When playing a .mov in Media Player, I can't then open the file for read access [eg C# - FileStream fsIn = File.Open(sourceURL, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read) throws an exception].
Any chance you could fix this, please, or provide the source so I can fix it? Cheers.
Any chance you could fix this, please, or provide the source so I can fix it? Cheers.